Archived story4 articles · 3 publishers
US completes troop withdrawal from Iraq, ending 12-year mission
- Published
- Updated
- Reports
- 4 from 3 publishers
The U.S. military completed its withdrawal from Erbil Air Base, ending Operation Inherent Resolve in Iraq and relocating its headquarters to Jordan. Iraq marked the departure with 'Sovereignty Days,' though some Iraqis fear an uncertain future caught between Washington and Tehran.
AI summary · Original reporting is linked alongside
How the outlets frame it
3 outlets, each read from its own headline and opening- Stands outThe New York Times (leans negative, mildly sensational, some charged words, one-sided).
- PlainestFox News.
Tap a logo to see the outlet, the headline it was read from, and where it sits on every measure.
Does the report cast the development as bad news or good news?
The New York Times stands apart as leans negative; the other 2 read as neutral.
Does the report play the story up to grab attention?
Between measured and mildly sensational; no outlet stands apart.
Do the words judge rather than describe?
Between neutral wording and some charged words; no outlet stands apart.
Does the report give room to one side only?
Fox News reads as straight, The New York Times as one-sided.
1 outlet not placed: the reading was split between distant levels.
All 3 outlets and the headlines they were read from
Al Jazeera
How does Iraq’s security change after US forces withdraw?Framing: Neutral · Sensationalism: Measured · Loaded language: Neutral wording · Slant: not placed
Fox News
US military completes withdrawal of troops from Iraq after 12-year missionFraming: Neutral · Sensationalism: Measured · Loaded language: Neutral wording · Slant: Straight
The New York Times
American Forces Withdraw From Iraq 23 Years After InvadingFraming: Leans negative · Sensationalism: Mildly sensational · Loaded language: Some charged words · Slant: One-sided
Each outlet is read blind: a classifier sees its headline and opening next to the story's own headline, without the outlet's name, and scores how the report presents the story. A logo sits at the classifier's average reading, so it can fall between two levels. These readings compare coverage of this story only; they are not ratings of the outlets.
Where the outlets diverge
Two headlines from opposite endsFraming · Negative → Positive
The story as a whole
Read from all the reports togetherNot disputed in the text
Official statement or press release
Attributed to named officials or documents
Other signals
8 found · 13 not present- Article typeNews report
- TopicMilitary and defence
- Policy areaDefence and military policy
- Government levelFederal
- Where it happensMiddle East and North Africa
- What a reader getsNew facts
- ToneNeutral and factual
- Main political actorA government agency
- Civil liberties questionnot present
- Market relevancenot present
- Which marketunclear
- Market horizonnot present
- Who is economically affectednot present
- Corporate dimensionnot present
- Conflict dimensionnot present
- Conflict direction reportednot present
- Humanitarian impactnot present
- Public safetynot present
- Public healthnot present
- Scientific evidencenot present
- Legal risk in the reportingnot present
The 10 stories everyone is covering, in your inbox at 7 am your time.
grouped.news is free, independent and has no paywall. If it saves you time, chip in.Buy us a coffee ↗