Archived story7 articles · 4 publishers
Michael Che dodges questions on Shane Gillis monologue
- Published
- Updated
- Reports
- 7 from 4 publishers
Michael Che dodged questions about Shane Gillis' controversial "SNL" monologue, which included disparaging remarks about women, during an awkward exchange on "Today." Separately, Dan Levy defended the backlash, saying "complacency" creates environments where women are sexually assaulted.
AI summary · Original reporting is linked alongside
How the outlets frame it
4 outlets, each read from its own headline and opening- Stands outReason (neutral, mildly sensational, some charged words, one-sided) and CBS News (mildly sensational, one-sided).
- PlainestBreitbart and New York Post.
Tap a logo to see the outlet, the headline it was read from, and where it sits on every measure.
Does the report cast the development as bad news or good news?
Reason stands apart as neutral; the other 3 read as leans negative.
Does the report play the story up to grab attention?
All 4 read as mildly sensational.
Do the words judge rather than describe?
Between neutral wording and some charged words; no outlet stands apart.
Does the report give room to one side only?
Split: Breitbart and New York Post read as straight; CBS News and Reason as one-sided.
All 4 outlets and the headlines they were read from
Breitbart
Chiefs Star Travis Kelce in Hot Water for Liking Shane Gillis’ SNL MonologueFraming: Leans negative · Sensationalism: Mildly sensational · Loaded language: Neutral wording · Slant: Straight
CBS News
Shane Gillis under fire over SNL monologueFraming: Leans negative · Sensationalism: Mildly sensational · Loaded language: Neutral wording · Slant: One-sided
New York Post
Michael Che dodges questions about Shane Gillis’ controversial ‘SNL’ monologue in awkward exchangeFraming: Leans negative · Sensationalism: Mildly sensational · Loaded language: Some charged words · Slant: Straight
Reason
The Shane Gillis SNL Backlash Is Really StupidFraming: Neutral · Sensationalism: Mildly sensational · Loaded language: Some charged words · Slant: One-sided
Each outlet is read blind: a classifier sees its headline and opening next to the story's own headline, without the outlet's name, and scores how the report presents the story. A logo sits at the classifier's average reading, so it can fall between two levels. These readings compare coverage of this story only; they are not ratings of the outlets.
Where the outlets diverge
Two headlines from opposite endsSlant · Straight → One-sided
The story as a whole
Read from all the reports togetherAffects a specific US group
Single event
No time pressure
No violence reported
Other signals
3 found · 18 not present- TopicCulture and entertainment
- What a reader getsNew facts
- ToneNeutral and factual
- Article typenot present
- Policy areanot present
- Government levelnot present
- Where it happensnot present
- Main political actornot present
- Civil liberties questionnot present
- Market relevancenot present
- Which marketunclear
- Market horizonnot present
- Who is economically affectednot present
- Corporate dimensionnot present
- Conflict dimensionnot present
- Conflict direction reportednot present
- Humanitarian impactnot present
- Public safetynot present
- Public healthnot present
- Scientific evidencenot present
- Legal risk in the reportingnot present
The 10 stories everyone is covering, in your inbox at 7 am your time.
grouped.news is free, independent and has no paywall. If it saves you time, chip in.Buy us a coffee ↗