Archived story3 articles · 3 publishers
US troops complete withdrawal from Iraq, Pentagon announces
- Published
- Updated
- Reports
- 3 from 3 publishers
The Pentagon formally completed the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, two years after the agreement and 12 years after the mission began. Iraq celebrated Sovereignty Day as it assumes full control over its security and counterterrorism efforts.
AI summary · Original reporting is linked alongsideHow the outlets frame it
3 outlets, each read from its own headline and opening- Stands outThe Guardian (mildly sensational, one-sided) and The Times of India (neutral, mildly sensational, some charged words).
- PlainestAl Jazeera.
Tap a logo to see the outlet, the headline it was read from, and where it sits on every measure.
Does the report cast the development as bad news or good news?
The Times of India stands apart as neutral; the other 2 read as leans positive.
Does the report play the story up to grab attention?
Between measured and mildly sensational; no outlet stands apart.
Do the words judge rather than describe?
Between neutral wording and some charged words; no outlet stands apart.
Does the report give room to one side only?
Only The Guardian could be placed, as one-sided.
2 outlets not placed: the reading was split between distant levels.
All 3 outlets and the headlines they were read from
Al Jazeera
Iraq celebrates Sovereignty Day as US troops complete withdrawalFraming: Leans positive · Sensationalism: Measured · Loaded language: Neutral wording · Slant: not placed
The Guardian
Pentagon says it has formally completed withdrawal of US troops from IraqFraming: Leans positive · Sensationalism: Mildly sensational · Loaded language: Neutral wording · Slant: One-sided
The Times of India
US troops finally leave Iraq 23 years after Saddam’s fallFraming: Neutral · Sensationalism: Mildly sensational · Loaded language: Some charged words · Slant: not placed
Each outlet is read blind: a classifier sees its headline and opening next to the story's own headline, without the outlet's name, and scores how the report presents the story. A logo sits at the classifier's average reading, so it can fall between two levels. These readings compare coverage of this story only; they are not ratings of the outlets.
Where the outlets diverge
Two headlines from opposite endsFraming · Negative → Positive
The story as a whole
Read from all the reports togetherSingle event
Official statement or press release
Attributed to named officials or documents
Other signals
6 found · 16 not present- Article typeNews report
- TopicMilitary and defence
- Government levelFederal
- Where it happensMiddle East and North Africa
- What a reader getsNew facts
- ToneNeutral and factual
- Policy areanot present
- Viewpoints presentednot present
- Main political actornot present
- Civil liberties questionnot present
- Market relevancenot present
- Which marketunclear
- Market horizonnot present
- Who is economically affectednot present
- Corporate dimensionnot present
- Conflict dimensionnot present
- Conflict direction reportednot present
- Humanitarian impactnot present
- Public safetynot present
- Public healthnot present
- Scientific evidencenot present
- Legal risk in the reportingnot present
The 10 stories everyone is covering, in your inbox at 7 am your time.
grouped.news is free, independent and has no paywall. If it saves you time, chip in.Buy us a coffee ↗