Archived story5 articles · 4 publishers
Poll: Most say Trump prioritizes wealth over helping people
- Published
- Updated
- Reports
- 5 from 4 publishers
A new AP-NORC poll found that 56% of Americans say Trump is more interested in his own wealth than helping people like them. Another survey showed only 28% approve of Trump's handling of the economy, with midterm voting underway.
AI summary · Original reporting is linked alongside
How the outlets frame it
4 outlets, each read from its own headline and opening- Stands outTIME (negative, mildly sensational, some charged words).
- PlainestThe Hill, Al Jazeera and PBS NewsHour.
Tap a logo to see the outlet, the headline it was read from, and where it sits on every measure.
Does the report cast the development as bad news or good news?
TIME stands apart as negative; the other 2 read as neutral.
1 outlet not placed: the reading was split between distant levels.
Does the report play the story up to grab attention?
Between measured and mildly sensational; no outlet stands apart.
Do the words judge rather than describe?
TIME stands apart as some charged words; the other 3 read as neutral wording.
Does the report give room to one side only?
Both read as straight.
2 outlets not placed: the reading was split between distant levels.
All 4 outlets and the headlines they were read from
Al Jazeera
Majority in US say Trump prioritises personal wealth over all else: PollFraming: Neutral · Sensationalism: Measured · Loaded language: Neutral wording · Slant: Straight
PBS NewsHour
Poll: Majority of Americans say Trump prioritizes his personal financial interests over U.S. as a wholeFraming: not placed · Sensationalism: Measured · Loaded language: Neutral wording · Slant: not placed
The Hill
Most say Trump more interested in his wealth than helping people like them: SurveyFraming: Neutral · Sensationalism: Measured · Loaded language: Neutral wording · Slant: Straight
TIME
Most Americans Think Trump Is Profiting From the Presidency Illegally or Unethically, Poll FindsFraming: Negative · Sensationalism: Mildly sensational · Loaded language: Some charged words · Slant: not placed
Each outlet is read blind: a classifier sees its headline and opening next to the story's own headline, without the outlet's name, and scores how the report presents the story. A logo sits at the classifier's average reading, so it can fall between two levels. These readings compare coverage of this story only; they are not ratings of the outlets.
Where the outlets diverge
Two headlines from opposite endsFraming · Negative → Positive
Loaded language · Neutral → Loaded
The story as a whole
Read from all the reports togetherAffects most US readers
Single event
No time pressure
Not disputed in the text
Primary document or data
Attributed to named officials or documents
No violence reported
Other signals
7 found · 14 not present- Article typeData or report release
- TopicPolitics and government
- Government levelFederal
- Where it happensUnited States national
- What a reader getsNew facts
- ToneNeutral and factual
- Main political actorThe executive
- Policy areanot present
- Civil liberties questionnot present
- Market relevancenot present
- Which marketunclear
- Market horizonnot present
- Who is economically affectednot present
- Corporate dimensionnot present
- Conflict dimensionnot present
- Conflict direction reportednot present
- Humanitarian impactnot present
- Public safetynot present
- Public healthnot present
- Scientific evidencenot present
- Legal risk in the reportingnot present
The 10 stories everyone is covering, in your inbox at 7 am your time.
grouped.news is free, independent and has no paywall. If it saves you time, chip in.Buy us a coffee ↗