Archived story4 articles · 3 publishers
JPMorgan misses, Goldman beats in mixed Q3 bank earnings
- Published
- Updated
- Reports
- 4 from 3 publishers
JPMorgan reported a rare earnings miss with EPS of $5.57 versus estimates of $5.90 and revenue of $50.91 billion, below expectations, partly due to a drop in FICC trading revenue. Goldman Sachs delivered blowout revenue, with equities trading exceeding expectations while fixed-income trading disappointed.
AI summary · Original reporting is linked alongside
How the outlets frame it
3 outlets, each read from its own headline and opening- Stands outZeroHedge (mildly sensational, some charged words) and New York Post (mildly sensational, some charged words).
- PlainestCNBC.
Tap a logo to see the outlet, the headline it was read from, and where it sits on every measure.
Does the report cast the development as bad news or good news?
Between neutral and leans positive; no outlet stands apart.
Does the report play the story up to grab attention?
CNBC stands apart as measured; the other 2 read as mildly sensational.
Do the words judge rather than describe?
CNBC stands apart as neutral wording; the other 2 read as some charged words.
Does the report give room to one side only?
All 3 read as straight.
All 3 outlets and the headlines they were read from
CNBC
Bank earnings live updates: JPMorgan and Goldman executives discuss quarterly resultsFraming: Neutral · Sensationalism: Measured · Loaded language: Neutral wording · Slant: Straight
New York Post
JPMorgan records rare earnings miss, Goldman Sachs delivers blowout revenue in mixed quarterFraming: Neutral · Sensationalism: Mildly sensational · Loaded language: Some charged words · Slant: Straight
ZeroHedge
Goldman Reports Blowout Equity Trading Revenues As FICC DisappointsFraming: Leans positive · Sensationalism: Mildly sensational · Loaded language: Some charged words · Slant: Straight
Each outlet is read blind: a classifier sees its headline and opening next to the story's own headline, without the outlet's name, and scores how the report presents the story. A logo sits at the classifier's average reading, so it can fall between two levels. These readings compare coverage of this story only; they are not ratings of the outlets.
Where the outlets diverge
Two headlines from opposite endsSensationalism · Measured → Sensational
Loaded language · Neutral → Loaded
The story as a whole
Read from all the reports togetherAffects a specific US group
Not disputed in the text
Not political
No violence reported
Other signals
5 found · 16 not present- Article typeLive blog
- TopicMarkets and finance
- ToneNeutral and factual
- Which marketCorporate earnings or deals
- Corporate dimensionEarnings or results
- Policy areanot present
- Government levelnot present
- Where it happensunclear
- What a reader getsnot present
- Main political actornot present
- Civil liberties questionnot present
- Market relevancenot present
- Market horizonnot present
- Who is economically affectednot present
- Conflict dimensionnot present
- Conflict direction reportednot present
- Humanitarian impactnot present
- Public safetynot present
- Public healthnot present
- Scientific evidencenot present
- Legal risk in the reportingnot present
The 10 stories everyone is covering, in your inbox at 7 am your time.
grouped.news is free, independent and has no paywall. If it saves you time, chip in.Buy us a coffee ↗